Clinics are wiring AI into tumor boards, triage, and documentation. DearAuditor Eval builds the validation pipelines that answer that question — repeatably, on your cases, every time the model changes.
A validation pipeline is a fixed set of clinical cases with known-good answers, run against your AI workflow the same way every time. It deliberately stresses the workflow — missing documents, reworded inputs, swapped model versions — and measures what breaks. The result is a validation report you can hand to your quality manager or an auditor, regenerated on demand.
Both pipelines below run on public or synthetic cases, so we can show you everything: the cases, the failures, and the report.
An AI drafts the case summary a lung-cancer tumor board works from. This pipeline checks whether the draft survives missing documents, model swaps, and de-identification — on real, de-identified TCGA lung cases.
Read the pipeline → Worked exampleAn AI works through a remote consultation — complaint, history, attachments — and proposes diagnosis, workup, and treatment. This pipeline grades three Gemini generations against gold answers on original synthetic consultation cases, and shows what an honest FAIL looks like.
Read the pipeline →The pipelines run on validrig, our use-case-agnostic evaluation engine (AGPL-3.0). The engine and both example packs open as source repositories at launch. Clinic case banks and client data stay private — only the machinery and the open-data examples are public.
Your customers will be asked for validation evidence. Two hooks in your product make your tool validatable by pipelines like these — and easier to buy:
If you build clinical-AI tooling and want your product validatable, talk to us.
Start with the piece that fits and expand over time; every stage of the pipeline stands on its own.
This site presents methodology and worked examples. It is not regulatory advice.